Look
great but a compensation nightmare. Oh I've gazed my kneeeeeee!! You can
sue, go on sue the council. Negligence, they should have known. But they
look good. They look good because they ain't uniform. Big slaps of stone,
texture, oblong shapes to fit. Rip them up - lay down the tarmac - machine
rollered on the level. Or, keep them it adds character.
Two roads off Beech Road have retained their flagstones - Wilton Road and Cross Road both by the Recreation Ground. Not pavement or sidewalk - but the lumps of quarry and chisel work that hewed them. But elsewhere it's a different story.
Residents
Angry as bid to save flagstones fails
by Alan Charnley.
South Manchester Express May
7 1999
Irate residents have flagged up
surrender in their fight to save Victorian flagstones on pavements in a
cul-de-sac. Conservationists living in the south Manchester suburb of Whalley
Range were livid when Manchester City Council began ripping up the 100-year-old
flagstones from one side of Athol Road. Because of their protest, the city
council briefly suspended work while complaints were investigated. Residents
were even more miffed when told by council workmen that the Yorkstone flagstone
would eventually be relaid in more "fashionable" areas like Didsbury and
Chorlton. "It was like rubbing salt in the wound,' said one. Now the council
is continuing with work to re-surface pavements. Councillor Tony Burns,
chairman of city highways, said: 'The condition of pavements in Athol Road
gave cause of concern because they had been damaged by both wear and use
by cars crossing to access the houses. "The fund for repairing pavements
is also the fund which pays out compensation for injuries as a result of
people tripping over damaged pavements. 'Over the years pavements had been
repaired so that in lots of cases the former Yorkstone had been replaced
by the concrete flagstones and also by patches of rolled tar. 'The repairs
in Athol Road, unfortunately, cannot he made by the replacing of Yorkstone
as this would mean the entire length would have to be done this way and
the cost would he prohibitive. 'Concrete paving stones are no longer used
by the council except in small areas and not for full reconstruction of
the foot- way.' Coun Burns told residents in a letter: 'Given that the
city has been starved of funds over recent years and this is an attempt
to make the best use of scarce resources I hope that you find this acceptable."
Resident Richard Adamson said: "It seems that we have no redress against
what is happening. "We have been told that the local councillors had agreed
that the work went ahead because they believed it was what the residents
wanted - but it wasn't."